Worth it for / Skip if
Worth it for — knowing the bill before you go — the venue publishes S$22 for the item on record; arriving by train — the record puts it 5 minutes on foot from Orchard MRT.
Every clause above is drawn from a named field in this venue's record — a published price, a booking route, the verified hours — and nothing else.
What it costs
The venue publishes S$22 for the single item on record. No service-charge or GST note is recorded against any priced row, so no all-in figure is estimated here.
Confirm the current price with the venue when you book. Forkin publishes prices only where a dated public source carries them, and flags it when sources disagree. Source: Official menu. Last checked 1 September 2026.
How to get a seat
No online booking channel is on record for this venue. Verified hours are not on record either, so call ahead before travelling.
What to expect
- Menu — A selection of 1 item from the venue’s own published menu is on record, with prices.
- Getting there — Orchard MRT, 5 minutes on foot · 390 Orchard Road, #B1-04/05, Palais Renaissance, Singapore 238871.
- Dietary requests, dress code and group size — not on record. Ask when you call ahead.
The longer version
Fen Chia’s September 2026 Asia361 account describes a meal at LingZhi Greens’ new Palais Renaissance premises. She highlights the mushroom bisque, the textural contrast in the mala fungus dish, the stuffed morels and crisp beancurd wraps, and describes the desserts as light rather than cloying. The tomato dish was less striking to her, but the report is strongly favourable overall and provides little material criticism. This is one reviewer’s account, not a Forkin visit or multi-source consensus. SG Food on Foot’s separate invited tasting is cited only as disclosed context and does not support the rating.
What the published coverage says, assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 1 linked source — not a personal dining review. Every source behind it is under How this was assessed.
Signature dishes
No dish is named for this venue in any source on record. Dishes are listed here only where an official source names them, so none are guessed from menus or reviews.
Opening hours
Day-by-day hours are not verified for this venue. Hours are published here only once a dated source has been read for the whole week, so a partial week is never shown as a full one.
If not this, then
Assessed Chinese and Vegetarian listings from Forkin's own directory — cuisine first, never geography alone.
- Same tier — Behind Clay · WORTH A LOOK · Clarke Quay · Clarke Quay MRT
- A different call — Hua Ting Restaurant · FORKIN WORTH IT · Orchard · Orchard MRT
- Also on record — Beng Hiang (Shangri-La Singapore) · WORTH A LOOK · Tanglin · Stevens MRT
Nearby
Inside LingZhi Greens
No rights-cleared photograph of this venue is on record. Forkin publishes a photograph only where provenance and permitted use are recorded against the file, and never republishes an image from a review, a social post or a search result.
Official Instagram
Official posts by @tunglokgroup on Instagram ↗. Forkin' Worth It does not host or reuse these images — displayed as links to Instagram's public posts only.
Common questions
How much is LingZhi Greens?
The item on record is S$22, as published by the venue. Drinks are extra unless the venue states otherwise. Prices last checked 1 September 2026.
At a glance
Orchard390 Orchard Road, #B1-04/05, Palais Renaissance, Singapore 238871
Orchard MRT, 5 min
Opened 10 August 2026
Last verified 17 August 2026
How this was assessed
This listing was assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 1 linked substantive source, at confidence low (provisional; one substantive established-publisher evaluation), last assessed 8 October 2026. The full scoring breakdown and every source is below.
Sourced from TungLok Group (official) and facebook.com. 2 sources in total.
Why LingZhi Greens scores 7.4
WORTH A LOOK · band 7.0–8.4 (base 7.5)
The Forkin Evidence Score is a transparent calibration of the published evidence behind this venue's editorial stamp — not a personal dining rating, and never derived from Google data. It starts from the stamp's base value, applies the five evidence adjustments below, then clamps the result inside the stamp's band.
- Source consensuslimited−0.15one/limited attributable source
- Critic calibreestablished+0.05established editorial food/lifestyle publication backing
- Praise specificityhigh+0.10multiple concrete dish/experience signals and supporting guide detail
- Consistencylow−0.15mixed stamp, explicit caveats, or material contrary signals
- Evidence recencycurrent+0.05newest assessment, publication, or verification is 2025 onward
Scores are rounded to one decimal place and are only published for venues carrying an evidence-backed editorial stamp. Full rubric: Forkin Evidence Score methodology.
Editorial stamp
WORTH A LOOK
Confidence: low (provisional; one substantive established-publisher evaluation)Forkin desk assessment of attributable public coverage — not a personal dining review.
Asia361's dated September 2026 first-person dish evaluation resolves to the new Palais Renaissance premises and registered established tier. No article-specific hosted/advertorial disclosure found after full-body/footer reading; absence of disclosure does not prove payment. Single-source provisional rating, low confidence. Explicitly invited SG Food on Foot article is context only; no old Liat Towers transfer. sourceConsensus=limited; evidenceRecency=current; praiseSpecificity=high; criticCalibre=established; consistency=low. Canonical integer calculator: 7.4.
Last assessed 8 October 2026 · 1 linked substantive source
Caveat: Provisional low-confidence assessment based on one substantive established-publisher evaluation. No cross-source consensus or repeat-visit consistency is claimed. No article-specific hosting disclosure was found in the countable Asia361 body or end matter. That is not proof the meal was self-paid; any later-confirmed invitation requires eligibility review. The explicitly invited SG Food on Foot tasting is not counted. Forkin did not conduct these dining visits. The numeric score measures the strength of attributed public evidence, not a personal taste rating. Bounded search and available 150 Markdown history records plus recent daily ledgers, not an exhaustive 90-day absence-of-hold proof. Missing archives remain uncertified. Older reviews are explicitly judged for current usefulness, not automatically refreshed by today's retrieval, current official listing or modified timestamps. Unlisted publishers are not silently tiered. No current same-day meal was conducted by Forkin.
How these stamps work · They are non-numerical and separate from Google Maps information.
Full source log
This opening record is backed by the following public sources:
TungLok Group (official) · 2026-08-05TungLok Group (official Facebook) · 2026-08-05Facts, opening hours and social profiles can change. Confirm current details directly with the venue before visiting. Record last verified 17 August 2026.