Worth it for / Skip if
Not on record yet. Clauses here are generated only from named fields — a published price, a booking route, the verified hours — and this venue carries too few of them to draw the line honestly. Nothing is inferred to fill the gap.
What it costs
No priced item is on record for this venue. Forkin publishes a price only where a dated public source carries it, so nothing is estimated here.
How to get a seat
No online booking channel is on record for this venue. Verified hours are not on record either, so call ahead before travelling.
What to expect
Nothing is on record for this venue yet. Every bullet in this section is drawn from a sourced field — a menu, a halal status, the nearest station, the verified closed days — and none of those is held.
The longer version
DanielFoodDiary: Read substantive exact-outlet firsthand evaluation. Names three mains and $22.90 pricing; comments that the ketchup-based Napolitan has a well-balanced sweetness and charming details; article’s title and food review cover tiger-prawn mentaiko pasta and other dishes. Footer explicitly says DFD paid for food reviewed unless otherwise stated. Countable independent-tier source; no hosting disclosure. The Ranting Panda: Full body read; substantive firsthand assessment of burrata/edamame puree, cold kombu ikura pasta, tiger-prawn mentaiko pasta, Napolitan, sea-salt gelato; gives dish sensory notes, concerns about the tiny 12-seat open layout, recommends it and supplies 3.5/5 overall. No hosted/paid/sponsorship disclosure found in article body. Countable independent-tier source.
What the published coverage says, assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 2 linked sources — not a personal dining review. Every source behind it is under How this was assessed.
Signature dishes
No dish is named for this venue in any source on record. Dishes are listed here only where an official source names them, so none are guessed from menus or reviews.
Opening hours
Day-by-day hours are not verified for this venue. Hours are published here only once a dated source has been read for the whole week, so a partial week is never shown as a full one.
If not this, then
Assessed Japanese and Italian listings from Forkin's own directory — cuisine first, never geography alone.
- Same tier — Pizza Studio Tamaki · WORTH A LOOK · Tanjong Pagar · Maxwell MRT
- A different call — Buona Terra · FORKIN WORTH IT · Orchard · Newton MRT
- Also on record — Basilico · WORTH A LOOK · Orchard · Orchard Boulevard MRT
Inside Saikyo Pasta
No rights-cleared photograph of this venue is on record. Forkin publishes a photograph only where provenance and permitted use are recorded against the file, and never republishes an image from a review, a social post or a search result.
Official Instagram
@saikyopastaView Saikyo Pasta on Instagram →Verified recent posts from this account are not yet on record, so none are embedded here. Forkin' Worth It only embeds posts it has verified as published by the venue's own official account, and never copies or rehosts Instagram images.
Common questions
No question can be answered from this venue's record yet. Answers here are generated from sourced fields only — a published price, a booking route, the verified hours — so none is written where the field behind it is missing.
At a glance
Tanjong PagarIcon Village, #01-86/87, 12 Gopeng Street, Singapore 078877
Opened July 2026
Last verified 3 October 2026
How this was assessed
This listing was assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 2 linked substantive sources, at confidence medium, last assessed 5 October 2026. The full scoring breakdown and every source is below.
Sourced from Time Out Singapore and The Ranting Panda. 2 sources in total.
Why Saikyo Pasta scores 7.7
WORTH A LOOK · band 7.0–8.4 (base 7.5)
The Forkin Evidence Score is a transparent calibration of the published evidence behind this venue's editorial stamp — not a personal dining rating, and never derived from Google data. It starts from the stamp's base value, applies the five evidence adjustments below, then clamps the result inside the stamp's band.
- Source consensusmoderate+0.05two independent attributable sources or some disagreement
- Critic calibreindependent0.00independent/blog-only attributable backing
- Praise specificityhigh+0.10multiple concrete dish/experience signals and supporting guide detail
- Consistencymoderate0.00generally favourable without a strong unanimity signal
- Evidence recencycurrent+0.05newest assessment, publication, or verification is 2025 onward
Scores are rounded to one decimal place and are only published for venues carrying an evidence-backed editorial stamp. Full rubric: Forkin Evidence Score methodology.
Editorial stamp
WORTH A LOOK
Confidence: mediumForkin desk assessment of attributable public coverage — not a personal dining review.
Two clean, exact-outlet independent reviews support the multi-source route. Both give specific dish-level descriptions and favorable overall recommendations; Ranting Panda also notes price/limited seating. Consensus and consistency are moderate rather than strong given two sources and some drawbacks. Both are current. No numeric score calculated. Publication decision: WORTH A LOOK; two independent source bodies reviewed.
Last assessed 5 October 2026 · 2 linked substantive sources
Caveat: Desk assessment based on two independent published evaluations; this is an evidence score, not a personal dining rating.
How these stamps work · They are non-numerical and separate from Google Maps information.
Full source log
This opening record is backed by the following public sources:
Time Out Singapore · 2026-10-02The Ranting Panda · 2026-09-08Facts, opening hours and social profiles can change. Confirm current details directly with the venue before visiting. Record last verified 3 October 2026.