Worth it for / Skip if
Not on record yet. Clauses here are generated only from named fields — a published price, a booking route, the verified hours — and this venue carries too few of them to draw the line honestly. Nothing is inferred to fill the gap.
What it costs
No priced item is on record for this venue. Forkin publishes a price only where a dated public source carries it, so nothing is estimated here.
How to get a seat
No online booking channel is on record for this venue. Verified hours are not on record either, so call ahead before travelling.
What to expect
Nothing is on record for this venue yet. Every bullet in this section is drawn from a sourced field — a menu, a halal status, the nearest station, the verified closed days — and none of those is held.
The longer version
Daniel Food Diary found the white coffee smooth and rounded and the spicy bacon loaf crisp and well browned, while judging that bake "okay, nothing really to shout about". HungryGoWhere's tasting notes on the osmanthus filter coffee and hojicha latte are consistent with that picture but carry no readable publication date, so they inform context only.
What the published coverage says, assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 1 linked source — not a personal dining review. Every source behind it is under How this was assessed.
Signature dishes
No dish is named for this venue in any source on record. Dishes are listed here only where an official source names them, so none are guessed from menus or reviews.
Opening hours
Day-by-day hours are not verified for this venue. Hours are published here only once a dated source has been read for the whole week, so a partial week is never shown as a full one.
If not this, then
Assessed Cafe and Japanese listings from Forkin's own directory — cuisine first, never geography alone.
- Same tier — Accompany Coffee · WORTH A LOOK · Joo Chiat
- A different call — Hamamoto · MIXED FORKS · Tanjong Pagar · Tanjong Pagar MRT
- Also on record — Daily Artisan & Bakery · WORTH A LOOK · Chinatown · Chinatown MRT
Inside Café Idaki
No rights-cleared photograph of this venue is on record. Forkin publishes a photograph only where provenance and permitted use are recorded against the file, and never republishes an image from a review, a social post or a search result.
Official Instagram
No official Instagram account is on record for this venue yet.
Common questions
No question can be answered from this venue's record yet. Answers here are generated from sourced fields only — a published price, a booking route, the verified hours — so none is written where the field behind it is missing.
At a glance
Holland Village17A Lorong Liput, Singapore
Opened 29 July 2026
Last verified 30 July 2026
How this was assessed
This listing was assessed by the Forkin editorial desk from 1 linked substantive source, at confidence low, last assessed 21 August 2026. The full scoring breakdown and every source is below.
Sourced from Daniel Food Diary. One source in total.
Full evidence log and scoring breakdown
Why Café Idaki scores 7.5
WORTH A LOOK · band 7.0–8.4 (base 7.5)
The Forkin Evidence Score is a transparent calibration of the published evidence behind this venue's editorial stamp — not a personal dining rating, and never derived from Google data. It starts from the stamp's base value, applies the five evidence adjustments below, then clamps the result inside the stamp's band.
- Source consensuslimited−0.15one/limited attributable source
- Critic calibreindependent0.00independent/blog-only attributable backing
- Praise specificityhigh+0.10multiple concrete dish/experience signals and supporting guide detail
- Consistencymoderate0.00generally favourable without a strong unanimity signal
- Evidence recencycurrent+0.05newest assessment, publication, or verification is 2025 onward
Scores are rounded to one decimal place and are only published for venues carrying an evidence-backed editorial stamp. Full rubric: Forkin Evidence Score methodology.
Editorial stamp
WORTH A LOOK
Confidence: lowForkin desk assessment of attributable public coverage — not a personal dining review.
One countable source survives re-verification. Daniel Food Diary (2026-07-29) is counted under desk ruling B20-R1 — dated, firsthand, exact-outlet at 17A Lorong Liput, with the publisher's standing self-payment statement and no contrary label. HungryGoWhere is withdrawn from the count under desk ruling B20-R2: re-retrieval on 2026-08-21 found no publication date anywhere on the page, the previously recorded July 2026 date having been inferred from image asset paths rather than read from the page. The single surviving assessment is favourable but measured, which supports a provisional WORTH A LOOK at the low end. RE-READ 5 Sep 2026 (batch 44): the row's basis field still carried a 15 Aug 2026 note that the source type 'does not qualify as countable editorial evidence', directly contradicting this record's own count of it. Read in the browser, the 29 Jul 2026 article is dated, exact-outlet, first-hand and carries concrete dish-level verdicts including a lukewarm one, so the count stands and the stale note is removed. criticCalibre is corrected back from 'established' to 'independent' under batch-46 rule B46-R1: Daniel Food Diary's own About and Advertising pages describe a blog with a single named author and no other contributors, so it registers as independent regardless of reach, and the score recomputes to 7.5. The single-source limitation is unchanged and the stamp remains provisional.
Last assessed 21 August 2026 · 1 linked substantive source
Linked evidence
Daniel Food Diary · 29 July 2026HungryGoWhere · contextCafé Idaki official Instagram · 6 August 2026 · contextCaveat: HungryGoWhere does not expose a hosting or sponsorship disclosure in the inspected page, and on re-retrieval (2026-08-21) exposes no publication date either; it is context only under desk ruling B20-R2. The Daniel Food Diary payment statement is standing site policy rather than a source-specific receipt for this article. The outlet was newly opened when both assessments were published, so longer-run consistency is not established. Single countable source, and under rule B46-R1 that source registers as an independent publisher rather than an established title, so this stamp no longer satisfies the established-publisher condition of the single-source exception. It is queued for withdrawal review; the band and score are retained only pending that decision, and the limitation is disclosed here rather than scored away.
How these stamps work · They are non-numerical and separate from Google Maps information.
This opening record is backed by the following public sources:
Daniel Food Diary · 2026-07-29Facts, opening hours and social profiles can change. Confirm current details directly with the venue before visiting. Record last verified 30 July 2026.